An attempt to stave off government-controlled health care

February 21, 2007

Big Pharma is encouraging employer drug programs:

Another motive for the business world could be to stave off a greater government involvement in health insurance, now that most presidential candidates and other politicians are promoting health care reform.

Big drug makers like Pfizer and Merck, which could benefit politically and financially from the employer drug programs, are also supporting the effort.

Richard T. Clark, the chief executive of Merck, made the political connection in a recent trade journal article. “If we all don’t do a better job, the private employer-based market will continue to weaken and the country will move forward toward rationing of care and greater government control, with greater pressure for a single-payer model with price controls,” Mr. Clark wrote in the American Journal of Managed Care.



Related posts:

  1. Government-controlled health care
  2. Government-run health care: Further depersonalizing medicine
  3. Health care in China: Access is controlled by organized gangs of scalpers
  4. Sarah Palin and health care
  5. American health care: Some positivity please
  6. Government-run health care
  7. Do people need comprehensive health insurance?


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 1 comment }

1 Anonymous February 21, 2007 at 10:33 am

If big pharma is concerned, we must be on the right path.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: No give, no take

Next post: "You can’t blame the providers for not wanting to see us because the federal government is paying so little"

Site Meter