Ironically, a law meant to help consumers is now hurting them:
The “pay to delay” deals are an anti-consumer twist on a law that was meant to help the public. The law was supposed to encourage generics to negotiate settlements that would bring them to market sooner, but the result has been a delayed market entry. Typically, the price of the first generic on the market is 20 percent lower than the brand-name price, and generic competition can reduce prices as much as 80 percent.Increasingly, however, the industry’s idea of a settlement is to pay off the generics to kill the challenges. The Federal Trade Commission says Schering-Plough of Kenilworth paid $90 million to two generic companies positioned to market a cheaper version of a Schering blood pressure drug. Bristol Myers Squibb agreed to pay $40 million to a Canadian generic to delay a knockoff of the blockbuster blood thinner Plavix, a deal that eventually fell through and led to regime change at Bristol Myers Squibb.
(via PharmaGossip)
Related posts:
- Drug companies responsible for generic side effects?
- Do drug companies and the pharma industry deserve to be villains?
- Pharmacies in bed with drug companies?
- Paying doctors off to use generic medications
- The booming generic medication business
- Are generic drugs truly equivalent to brand name medications?
- Districting viewers from drug risks
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe





{ 1 comment }
It would appear to have just happened to me. I was on a generic drug for Plavix — the generic company is Apot. I was informed by a CVS that the Generic is not longer available. Go Figure!
the ” pay to delay” is alive and well.
Jack
jdeyork@aol.com
Comments on this entry are closed.