The New Yorker writes about the pitfalls of clinical suspicion:
Doctors typically begin to diagnose patients the moment they meet them. Even before they conduct an examination, they are interpreting a patient’s appearance: his complexion, the tilt of his head, the movements of his eyes and mouth, the way he sits or stands up, the sound of his breathing. Doctors’ theories about what is wrong continue to evolve as they listen to the patient’s heart, or press on his liver. But research shows that most physicians already have in mind two or three possible diagnoses within minutes of meeting a patient, and that they tend to develop their hunches from very incomplete information. To make diagnoses, most doctors rely on shortcuts and rules of thumb””known in psychology as “heuristics.”
Related posts:
- Is Google responsible for the decline of cognitive medicine?
- You’re spending too much time with patients
- What are the three little words to diagnose cognitive impairment?
- Health reform and cognitive dissonance
- The psychology behind Spitzer’s thinking
- Do physician report cards harm patients?
- A WSJ op-ed calls out John Edwards’ exploitation of Nataline Sarkisyan
KevinMD.com on Facebook
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe







Comments on this entry are closed.