<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Americans rank next-to-last in acceptance of evolution as a scientific fact</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/01/americans-rank-next-to-last-in.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/01/americans-rank-next-to-last-in.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: RJS</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/01/americans-rank-next-to-last-in.html#comment-70710</link> <dc:creator>RJS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/01/americans-rank-next-to-last-in-acceptance-of-evolution-as-a-scientific-fact.html#comment-70710</guid> <description>Big f&#039;n surprise, given the Discovery Institute&#039;s deceptive &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://rianjs.net/2005/12/teaching-the-controversy/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Teach the controversy&quot;&lt;/a&gt; evolution smear campaign. Rather than come out and be directly against evolution, it&#039;s much more underhanded (and effective) to invent a &quot;scientific controversy&quot; instead -- where, of course, one does not exist.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The irony of my vehemence is that I used to be a hard-core fundy creationist. Until I went to pharmacy school. (Hah!)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big f&#8217;n surprise, given the Discovery Institute&#8217;s deceptive <a HREF="http://rianjs.net/2005/12/teaching-the-controversy/" REL="nofollow">&#8220;Teach the controversy&#8221;</a> evolution smear campaign. Rather than come out and be directly against evolution, it&#8217;s much more underhanded (and effective) to invent a &#8220;scientific controversy&#8221; instead &#8212; where, of course, one does not exist.</p><p>The irony of my vehemence is that I used to be a hard-core fundy creationist. Until I went to pharmacy school. (Hah!)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.002 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 341/345 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 13:45:43 -->
