Not-for-profit vs for-profit hospitals

December 11, 2006

Which provides better patient care? The answer is somewhat obvious:

Bruce Landon, MD, MBA, associate professor of health care policy at HMS, and colleagues found that overall, not-for-profit hospitals consistently performed better than for-profit hospitals when it came to delivering high-quality care for three common medical conditions: congestive heart failure (CHF); heart attack (acute myocardial infarction, AMI); and pneumonia.



Related posts:

  1. Why removing the tax breaks for non-profit hospitals could be dangerous
  2. Does being on the America’s Best Hospitals list affect patient outcomes?
  3. From nonprofit hospitals to "profit machines"
  4. Hospitals lose money by preventing patient re-admissions
  5. Are all for-profit health care companies evil?
  6. Hospitals banning cellphones for profit?
  7. For-profit medical school


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Psychological analysis of the criticism of James Kim

Next post: The "Rodney Dangerfield" of diseases

Site Meter