Their response was that the disease was not “biologically based.”
Related posts:
- Why pro-anorexia websites are spreading to Facebook
- The price of covering everyone
- Aetna gets Microsoft envy
- Aetna to End Payment for a Drug in Colonoscopies
- YouTube and anorexia
- Anorexia bodyshots on YouTube
- DNRs and being sued
KevinMD.com on Facebook
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe





{ 1 comment }
Sure, neurotransmitters and other biochemical markers differ, but does their difference cause the disease or it it in response to a state of willful starvation. Vague associations of some gene being present twice as often in cases vs controls occur for many conditions, but what about the vast majority of people with the ‘disease state’ that don’t have the putative markers?
The insurer perhaps (the family should read the contract) has the obligation to provide validated therapy, but 101 days of inpatient care for someone who merely refuses to eat sounds like heroic levels of care.
Comments on this entry are closed.