Aetna is sued for not covering anorexia treatment

November 9, 2006

Their response was that the disease was not “biologically based.”



Related posts:

  1. Why pro-anorexia websites are spreading to Facebook
  2. The price of covering everyone
  3. Aetna gets Microsoft envy
  4. Aetna to End Payment for a Drug in Colonoscopies
  5. YouTube and anorexia
  6. Anorexia bodyshots on YouTube
  7. DNRs and being sued


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 1 comment }

1 Gasman November 9, 2006 at 12:48 pm

Sure, neurotransmitters and other biochemical markers differ, but does their difference cause the disease or it it in response to a state of willful starvation. Vague associations of some gene being present twice as often in cases vs controls occur for many conditions, but what about the vast majority of people with the ‘disease state’ that don’t have the putative markers?

The insurer perhaps (the family should read the contract) has the obligation to provide validated therapy, but 101 days of inpatient care for someone who merely refuses to eat sounds like heroic levels of care.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: UnitedHealth: It gets worse

Next post: Pope Benedict: Condoms the "lesser of two evils"

Site Meter