<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No-fault medical malpractice: &quot;The pluses seem to be increasingly outweighing the minuses&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/10/no-fault-medical-malpractice-pluses.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/10/no-fault-medical-malpractice-pluses.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:23:39 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TAPayne</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/10/no-fault-medical-malpractice-pluses.html/comment-page-1#comment-67950</link>
		<dc:creator>TAPayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/10/no-fault-medical-malpractice-the-pluses-seem-to-be-increasingly-outweighing-the-minuses.html#comment-67950</guid>
		<description>no fault insurance?it has worked so well in car insurance with everyone paying for the less than adequate driver just so they can keep driving? it has driven many companies (usually those with responsible corporate practices)out of these no fault markets and has increased insurance profits of those who remain (who are not reticent to capitalize on such a fallacy), do you really want to make such an error in something related to the medical field just so less than adequate medical professionals are immune to the attrition of their actions?it has been said that adequate professionals are suffering as well, but if there were less of the less than competant there would be no issue at all for these corporate shills to capitalize upon to use as an excuse to increase profitability on the backs of those who deserve their degrees and licenses, or drivers who dont abuse the priviledge of driving on our public roads</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no fault insurance?it has worked so well in car insurance with everyone paying for the less than adequate driver just so they can keep driving? it has driven many companies (usually those with responsible corporate practices)out of these no fault markets and has increased insurance profits of those who remain (who are not reticent to capitalize on such a fallacy), do you really want to make such an error in something related to the medical field just so less than adequate medical professionals are immune to the attrition of their actions?it has been said that adequate professionals are suffering as well, but if there were less of the less than competant there would be no issue at all for these corporate shills to capitalize upon to use as an excuse to increase profitability on the backs of those who deserve their degrees and licenses, or drivers who dont abuse the priviledge of driving on our public roads</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Criminallopath</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/10/no-fault-medical-malpractice-pluses.html/comment-page-1#comment-67876</link>
		<dc:creator>Criminallopath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/10/no-fault-medical-malpractice-the-pluses-seem-to-be-increasingly-outweighing-the-minuses.html#comment-67876</guid>
		<description>Why just limit it to medical malpractice and not all tort cases?  Oh, that&#039;s right.  Provider = profiteer = good but Provider = defendant = bad.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Perhaps one of these days we will see some actual reform to provide some teeth to the gutless state medical boards to actually start pulling the licenses of those that commit malpractice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why just limit it to medical malpractice and not all tort cases?  Oh, that&#8217;s right.  Provider = profiteer = good but Provider = defendant = bad.  </p>
<p>Perhaps one of these days we will see some actual reform to provide some teeth to the gutless state medical boards to actually start pulling the licenses of those that commit malpractice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/11 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2010-03-17 02:24:27 -->