A doctor loses a lawsuit after his nurse caused a pneumothorax

October 26, 2006

Sounds like the procedure was a trigger point injection or some other type of pain-alleviating injection. Caution to who you allow to give the injection, as this suit shows:

The suit alleged Barngrover was negligent in training and supervision, and that Peggy Holder, an advanced practice registered nurse, performed below standards when administering the injection. Hins’ argued the injection caused one of her lungs to collapse. The other collapsed later at a Columbus hospital, Johnson said.





  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Anonymous October 26, 2006 at 10:45 am

1. Get injured by a doctor.
2. If injury does not cause permanent damage, claim psychological or “pretend” damage.
3. Profit!

2 Anonymous October 26, 2006 at 11:19 am

What is the basis for this award? Maybe there should be damages awarded but 1.5 million?? Come on. This once again shows what is wrong with a lay jury deciding level of damages.
PS: Before you ponitificate CJD. Unlike you I have taken care of dozens of pnuemothoraxes. So unlike you I actually know what I am talking about.

3 Anonymous October 26, 2006 at 11:34 am

Has anyone else had the following scenario? I had a patient come into the ER, complaining of a frontal headache. He lit up no “Red Flags”, so I discharged him with Motrin. When he was being discharged he told me that he had been diagnosed with a nasopharyngeal tumor and he wanted to see if he could trick me into mssing it. If he hadn’t told me I’m guessing his next stop could have been a sodomite’s office where he could have filed a lawsuit for “missed diagnosis”, as long as he could hide the fact he was previously diagnosed. A warning to others.

4 Anonymous October 26, 2006 at 12:04 pm

“What is the basis for this award? Maybe there should be damages awarded but 1.5 million?? Come on. This once again shows what is wrong with a lay jury deciding level of damages.
PS: Before you ponitificate CJD. Unlike you I have taken care of dozens of pnuemothoraxes. So unlike you I actually know what I am talking about.”

Are you in a better position than them to determine the level of her damages? Do you think she faked her medical bills?

You really have no idea what you’re talking about in terms of the value of her damages. Being a doctor doesn’t mean you know EVERYTHING.

5 Anonymous October 26, 2006 at 1:00 pm

“Are you in a better position than them to determine the level of her damages? Do you think she faked her medical bills?

You really have no idea what you’re talking about in terms of the value of her damages. Being a doctor doesn’t mean you know EVERYTHING.”

A jury is of course in a better position to determine her damages. It’s such an objective determination. We never hear surprises from these juries. They are after all “our peers”. 12 Homer Simpsons who can’t figure out a way out of jury Duty. Much more experienced in damage estimates and health care. God Bless America!

If it’s “Her damages”, why do you demand 30% and sue your own client if you think that’s not enough? When you do that, aren’t you defying the saying “don;t shit where you eat”?

6 Anonymous October 27, 2006 at 12:31 pm

“Are you in a better position than them to determine the level of her damages? Do you think she faked her medical bills?

You really have no idea what you’re talking about in terms of the value of her damages. Being a doctor doesn’t mean you know EVERYTHING”

Ahh hello. The article states that she sufered no long term damage (except posssibly psych in a patient already with a psych disorder). So the lowest common denominator decides that is worth 1.5 mil. The average doc has only 1 mil in insurance. The lowest common denominator (ie layjuror) decides a case for 1.5 mil in a case with no long-term injury. What happens when there really is a long term injurry 10 mil…100 mil ….1 billion? Again this shows what is wrong with 12 homer simpsons deciding damages on something they have no clue what they are talking about? In the end we as a society all pay the bill. Increased insurance costs, more difficulty in seeing docs, increased cost’s of all American products (why do you think our business is all moving to China), etc, etc. But now that would be looking at the big picture no wouldn’t it.

7 Anonymous November 18, 2006 at 11:37 am

What you don’t know, it that this “Doctor” billed the womans insurance company for that particular visit.

So:

1. Be a “Doctor” and injure a patient

2. Bill insurance company

3. Profit!

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post: Will the chest CT soon be part of the routine physical?

Next post: Calling it "malpractice", doctors are being reported for using brand name instead of generic medications

Site Meter