http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/10/controversy-over-non-invasive-emg.html Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:56:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/10/controversy-over-non-invasive-emg.html#comment-68048 drashish Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:00:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/10/controversy-over-the-non-invasive-emg.html#comment-68048 If a internits or FP uses revenue enhancing tools...why do they always attack it. Instead, provide results of whether the test is beneficial or not. Cost effective or not. Not, just because the PCP doctor makes money off it. Where's the evidence for or against. The article is only full of hearsay, anecdotal stories, and N of one opinions. not facts. NYT, do your readers favor and educate, not pontificate. If a internits or FP uses revenue enhancing tools…why do they always attack it. Instead, provide results of whether the test is beneficial or not. Cost effective or not. Not, just because the PCP doctor makes money off it. Where’s the evidence for or against. The article is only full of hearsay, anecdotal stories, and N of one opinions. not facts. NYT, do your readers favor and educate, not pontificate.

]]>