Breast lumps and unnecessary testing

October 2, 2006

Sid Schwab talks from a surgeon’s perspective:

In a nutshell, it comes down to this: when there’s a lump you can feel, diagnostic imaging (Xrays, ultrasound, etc.) is a waste of time and money. OK, that’s a bit over the top: you get needed information about the rest of the breast, and the other side, which will come into play at some point. But getting a bunch of studies — particularly without the input of a surgeon — as the initial step in working up a lump adds up to lots of unnecessary running around for the patient, distractions in the diagnostic process, and — not rarely — detours into side roads that never needed taking.



Related posts:

  1. How much unnecessary testing goes on in the ER?
  2. Unnecessary tests vs bankruptcy
  3. Testing surgeons’ skills
  4. Does a breast MRI have any benefit for patients with breast cancer?
  5. One doctor’s unnecessary procedure is another physician’s mortgage payment
  6. My take: Just say no to unnecessary tests
  7. Breast MRIs


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: An unintended benefit of prednisone

Next post: More on why physicians avoid email for patient communication

Site Meter