JAMA thinks so, as parents told to “wait and see” significantly reduced antibiotic use for ear infections. This can satisfy both the patient expectation of an antibiotic during a visit, as well as the provider worried about antibiotic resistance.
Related posts:
- Getting rid of a cold without antibiotics
- Long wait forces a cancer patient to buy the operation in land he fled
- Prepare to wait if you go to the ER with back pain, dizziness or constipation
- Saying no
- Dermatologist: "Long wait times reduce unnecessary biopsies"
- Don’t wait for the H1N1 vaccine before you get your flu shot
- What Mozart can teach us about suberbugs and antibiotic resistance
KevinMD.com on Facebook
Scrubs
{ 2 comments }
Will the AMA now come out with a similar statement supporting a “wait and see” attitude for ADULTS who are diagnosed with ear infections?
I often give antibiotics for ear infections on the outside chance the child develops meningitis/meningoencephalitis after I see him. At least i’ll be able to say I gave antibiotics in court. Sort of the same line of reasoning I use to admit all patients I see who have used cocaine. If they go out, use more cocaine and drop dead, at least I’m not the last schmuck victim with my name on their chart who did nothing.
Comments on this entry are closed.