Comments on: Informed consent doesn’t shield this neurosurgeon

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:49:00 +0000

By the way there were no “punitive” damages in this case. This was inaccurately (but widely) reported by the media – the $1m was for non-economic damages (pain & suffering, etc.)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 14 Sep 2006 03:58:00 +0000

Anon 10:59
You know what an ad hominium argument is? You should because you are making one.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:59:00 +0000

Still crying like when your daddy whipped you after he saw you watching mommy take a piss, eh?

C’mon little fella, buck up and be a man. You can still do it, I’m sure.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:51:00 +0000

The only crying that will be going on is you, when you get the Avian flu, the hospitals are overflowing with patients, you’re lying in a pool of your own blood-filled shit in the waiting room, and there’s no healthcare professional to see you because you’re a lawyer and you guys have alienated any decent human being from even wiping your putrid ass once you’re dead so your family doesn’t have to smell your shit. Like they do now. Bedtime, I’ll go pray by the side of my bed that this happens to you.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:55:00 +0000

Still crying, I see.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:40:00 +0000

What the hell are you talking about. In a few weeks I have to give a deposition after being served on a patient I never even saw. The shitheads are hoping I’ll say something to implicate myself or the other docs in a frivolous case. “That’s it”? They will bring as many of us to trial as they can, its like shaking a tree to see what falls out. The only thing that costs $2500 is the high priced hooker who sucks off the plaintiff’s attorney after he steals the healthcare systems money.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:17:00 +0000

"The posters above tell you that they first time they have heard about the suit is when they got served; how are you able to neglect that?"

What do you think "early" means?

Here's how it works. They get served. They tell their insurer. Their insurer gets an attorney who files an answer denying everything. Takes about 3 hours tops. Then, if you really want out, give a depo. It's that easy.

Cost your insurer probably $2500 tops.

Again, quit crying.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:14:00 +0000

The Human piece of shit thinks we realize we’re being sued when we send a patient home with an ingrown toenail and the patient drops dead at home after doing too much cocaine, like we have a camera on them. They may lay off us, JAMA just announced that Vioxx is deadly (Like Merck planned it that way) all the Human pieces of shit may swarm to suing Merck like green flies on dogshit.

By: Samson Isberg

Samson Isberg — Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:40:00 +0000

What is this idiocy you keep harping about “giving an early depo” – do you have a learning disability? The posters above tell you that they first time they have heard about the suit is when they got served; how are you able to neglect that?

I have had the experience of being notified that my case was closed, the verdict was in, and that I could not appeal – and that was the first time I ever heard that there even was a case – but then I live in a socialist country.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 12 Sep 2006 18:33:00 +0000

So none of you have offered to give an early depo and get out of the case, correct?

Mostly just whined and complained. How do you overcome? Do you have spirituals, like the slaves of old, that help you to deal with the awesome amounts of oppression that the lawyers are putting on you?

I can almost hear you humming them now.

Whiny bitches.