OB/GYN: "Being sued is part of the job"

Another pro-Al Quida in America puff piece. These stories are a dime a dozen when it comes to the idolatrous rubes in the media – each and every one of them only discusses the cost of doing business (professional malpractice insurance rates) while failing to mention the after-expense income taken home by the providers that “are abandoning the field.” What are they abandoning, a fat six figure 180K-200K after-expense paycheck?

My comments must have hit home. Good. Expect more of the same when it comes to allopathic idolatry and the self-serving “whoa is me” whining from the provider community. The sophomoric attempts of the writer of the article to paint the providers as victims is not relevant to my commentary. What is of relevance, given the misplaced anger on your part, is the broken legal system that allows idiot providers free range as “experts” without having to answer, to the same degree as experts in other fields, to the appropriate rules of evidence. It is poetic justice when one of the Al Quida members gets a taste of their own medicine when allopathic junk science is brought into play.

The finger of blame should be pointed at your own bretheren. Think about that the next time some scumbag plaintiff in the making comes into your office claiming neck and back pain from an auto accident and you dutifully diagnosing posttraumatic cervical and lumbar strain/sprain injury secondary to MVA (post hoc ergo propter hoc and the physician as a freaking lie detector when it comes to patient history, which by the way, the majority of you have no clue how to actually analyze the purported cause, is the type of crap that passes in court as expert clinical testimony).

Physician lobbyists are why the expert witness requirement exists. Why would lawyers want to REQUIRE that they spend more money on a case?

Think before you type.

“Think before you type.”

Actually, you should. Physician lobbyists (oh, please) didn’t mandate expert witnesses in malpractice cases. Lawyers claim “experts” are needed to help try cases.

“Want to stop the junk clinical science in the courtroom?”

Actually, it can be stopped by preventing the “junk” lawsuits from ever going to trial.

“The lawyers force the Al Quida members to appear in court as expert witnesses? Really?”

No, not really. But, when’s Bin Laden showing up to testify for a sex offender? C’mon, your comments are absolutely absurd. I suppose you feel the same way for experts testifying on behalf of “victims”, lying through their teeth on the stand. And what about experts in other areas of the law for other kinds of trials? Are they suspect too? Are they members of Hezbollah?

Anon 8:29

Experts in other professions are not whining and crying like the allopaths on hand (as well as demanding special privileges available to no other profession regarding awards caps)and then bedding the same trial lawyers in the next breath when they can serve as profiteer by parroting what the plaintiff told them regarding some BS slip and fall or whiplash claim.

The Al Quida in America reference is apt. Go to a “conservative” website such as WND and you will see the threats from the AMA posted everywhere – terrorizing the old and infirm with loss of access to care (do no harm does not extend beyond the pocketbook) unless the same old and infirm act as a proxy of Al Quida in America to ensure the continued buying off of the allopathic elite.

“Again, think a little. Why in the world would lawyers support making med mal the most expensive individual personal injury cases to take”

Maybe because it’s the biggest jackpot a lawyer can get short of product liability cases.

Anon 11:42,

You seem like a very disturbed individual with a pathologic hatred of doctors and lawyers. Guess that means you won’t be seeking any help.

Anon 4:31,

It was the poster making comments about physicians being Al Quaida members that led to sarcastic comments about lawyers. Read the thread again.

Example from the first post:
“Another pro-Al Quida in America puff piece”

More examples:
“It is poetic justice when one of the Al Quida members gets a taste of their own medicine when allopathic junk science is brought into play.”
“threats from the AMA posted everywhere – terrorizing the old and infirm with loss of access to care (do no harm does not extend beyond the pocketbook) unless the same old and infirm act as a proxy of Al Quida in America to ensure the continued buying off of the allopathic elite.”

As far as respect for the 9/11 victims goes, it seems to me that the original poster is the one who has none.