Fraud and the Vioxx trials

August 8, 2006

Ted Frank cites a reason why Merck should not agree to a global settlement. (via PointofLaw.com)



Related posts:

  1. Delay in Vioxx payouts
  2. Plaintiffs are starting to drop their Vioxx lawsuits
  3. A jury of "uneducated casino workers" beat the hell out of Merck
  4. Does sorry really work?
  5. Pfizer fraud
  6. A "dishonest trial lawyer op-ed"
  7. Randomized trials for parachutes


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: More Castro speculation

Next post: A website identifies malpractice plaintiffs

Site Meter