Do you take your kids to a pediatrician or FP?

July 26, 2006

There are pros and cons to each. However with the fragmented nature of today’s health care, continuity of care is dwindling. That is a poor prognostic sign for FP:

But Wright’s situation rests on the fact she’s had the same insurance for 13 years.

In the modern U.S. economy, the benefits of having a long-term physician may never accrue anyway. Most people don’t stay for decades in one job. Switch jobs and you’re likely onto a new plan, with a whole new list of doctors.



Related posts:

  1. Drug seeking in the ER
  2. Pediatrician mistaken for pedophile
  3. Medpundit on Wal-Mart’s $4 generic drugs
  4. UnitedHealth’s bullying sales tactics
  5. Why rapid viral testing for kids with URIs may not help in the ER
  6. A pediatrician takes the anti-vaccine movement head on
  7. A pediatrician resigns after calling Obama “evil incarnate”


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 1 comment }

1 Anonymous July 26, 2006 at 12:26 pm

I am not a family physician, however, I support than 100%. My mother was a patient of a family physician. She also had diabetes, a heart condition, high blood pressure, and severe debilitating arthritis. She was seen by a cardiologist, an endocrinologist, and an orthopedic surgeon. Each physician would prescribe her a medication, but it was her family physician who kept track of all her medications, their drug interactions, etc. Specialists rarely follow more than one medical problem at a time. If my mother didn’t have a family physician, no one would have coordinated all her medical problems, and checked on her medications, and made sure that even the routine was taken care of.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: The walk-in clinic boom is betting big on the uninsured

Next post: Hope for the impending Medicare cuts?

Site Meter