Nice idea, especially since many decisions in medicine are based on percentages and probability.
Related posts:
- The dangers of quality
- The numbers behind the torcetrapib decision
- When will doctors find it acceptable to deny medical services?
- Descalped by a ferris wheel
- Walter Reed Army Medical Center to close, was lazy staff a factor in the decision?
- Shared decision making
- Strengthen visual spacialization with a 3-D MRI block puzzle
KevinMD.com on Facebook
{ 2 comments }
Great idea, you throw a dart at the board or spin the wheel and let it decide for you. Who needs to think?
“Judging by the numbers alone, there is a clear answer to this hypothetical problem: a person is much better off taking the vaccine.” Not true. if the chance of getting the disease is say 40% then the chance of death by disease is .4 * .1 = 4%. With the vaccine the chance of death is always 5%. So If the chance of getting infected is less than 50% taking the vaccine is the wrong choice.
Well, if doctors like Kevin don’t understand the difference between relative risk and absolute risk, what would you expect from journalists?
Am I the only one who finds it ironic that Kevin posted about percentages and probabilities during the same days he talked how he scares his patients into taking statins by using meaningless relative numbers (comparing 30% relative risk reduction with a small absolute risk of side effects).
Comments on this entry are closed.