Comments on: More Studdert malpractice study interpretation http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study.html Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:18:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Anonymoushttp://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study.html#comment-63358 Anonymous Wed, 24 May 2006 02:33:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study-interpretation.html#comment-63358 In every state where there is tort reform, why are medical services not cheaper?<br/><br/>This is a nonsense argument, and that's obvious. In every state where there is tort reform, why are medical services not cheaper?

This is a nonsense argument, and that’s obvious.

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study.html#comment-63350 Anonymous Wed, 24 May 2006 00:06:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study-interpretation.html#comment-63350 less defensive medicine = less cost to medical care = more people could afford health insurance premiums. Also more physicians willing to provide charity care or offer their specialty services to the emergency department. less defensive medicine = less cost to medical care = more people could afford health insurance premiums. Also more physicians willing to provide charity care or offer their specialty services to the emergency department.

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study.html#comment-63328 Anonymous Tue, 23 May 2006 17:46:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study-interpretation.html#comment-63328 Clearly, you want to discuss something irrelevant so you can deflect from the fact that this claim is complete nonsense.<br/><br/>So, I concede. Call your proposals whatever you want. Now, explain to me how enacting any of them is going to make more Americans have health insurance.<br/><br/><br/><br/>CJD Clearly, you want to discuss something irrelevant so you can deflect from the fact that this claim is complete nonsense.

So, I concede. Call your proposals whatever you want. Now, explain to me how enacting any of them is going to make more Americans have health insurance.

CJD

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study.html#comment-63322 Anonymous Tue, 23 May 2006 16:20:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study-interpretation.html#comment-63322 Hello CJD can you read?<br/>NOBODY IS TALKING IMMUNITY. <br/>Since you don't seem to understand the definition of immunity I was paste the definition for you:<br/><br/>Immunity \Im*mu"ni*ty\, n.; pl. Immunities. [L. immunitas, fr.<br/> immunis free from a public service; pref. im- not + munis<br/> complaisant, obliging, cf. munus service, duty: cf. F.<br/> immunit['e]. See Common, and cf. Mean, a.]<br/> 1. Freedom or exemption from any charge, duty, obligation,<br/> office, tax, imposition, penalty, or service; a particular<br/> privilege; as, the immunities of the free cities of<br/> Germany; the immunities of the clergy.<br/><br/> 2. Freedom; exemption; as, immunity from error.<br/><br/><br/>Got it? ....good now shut up. Hello CJD can you read?
NOBODY IS TALKING IMMUNITY.
Since you don’t seem to understand the definition of immunity I was paste the definition for you:

Immunity \Im*mu”ni*ty\, n.; pl. Immunities. [L. immunitas, fr.
immunis free from a public service; pref. im- not + munis
complaisant, obliging, cf. munus service, duty: cf. F.
immunit['e]. See Common, and cf. Mean, a.]
1. Freedom or exemption from any charge, duty, obligation,
office, tax, imposition, penalty, or service; a particular
privilege; as, the immunities of the free cities of
Germany; the immunities of the clergy.

2. Freedom; exemption; as, immunity from error.

Got it? ….good now shut up.

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study.html#comment-63313 Anonymous Tue, 23 May 2006 14:01:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study-interpretation.html#comment-63313 Again, it has nothing to do with grandstanding. I'm merely saying, in your best case scenario of immunity, please explain how more Americans would have health insurance.<br/><br/>So far, no answer.<br/><br/>CJD Again, it has nothing to do with grandstanding. I’m merely saying, in your best case scenario of immunity, please explain how more Americans would have health insurance.

So far, no answer.

CJD

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study.html#comment-63311 Anonymous Tue, 23 May 2006 13:28:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study-interpretation.html#comment-63311 Nobody is asking for immunity. Quit the grandstanding. Nobody is asking for immunity. Quit the grandstanding.

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study.html#comment-63305 Anonymous Tue, 23 May 2006 05:44:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study-interpretation.html#comment-63305 I was giving you the best case scenario in immunity, figuring that's the ultimate way to eliminate defensive medicine. <br/><br/>Kevin still can't support the above claim even if immunity existed.<br/><br/>CJD I was giving you the best case scenario in immunity, figuring that’s the ultimate way to eliminate defensive medicine.

Kevin still can’t support the above claim even if immunity existed.

CJD

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study.html#comment-63302 Anonymous Tue, 23 May 2006 04:27:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study-interpretation.html#comment-63302 " This may be the most far-fetched argument for physician immunity out there.<br/><br/>Sorry CJD I have not yet seen any physician asking for "immunity". The only person I see using the "immunity" argument is you. Maybe you need to look up the definition of "immunity" counsler. ” This may be the most far-fetched argument for physician immunity out there.

Sorry CJD I have not yet seen any physician asking for “immunity”. The only person I see using the “immunity” argument is you. Maybe you need to look up the definition of “immunity” counsler.

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study.html#comment-63293 Anonymous Mon, 22 May 2006 21:39:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/05/more-studdert-malpractice-study-interpretation.html#comment-63293 "Improving the medical malpractice system would lessen the costs of defensive medicine, which would provide a stable source of funding for health insurance - and better healthcare and a better quality of life -- for every American."<br/><br/>You must be joking. This may be the most far-fetched argument for physician immunity out there.<br/><br/>CJD “Improving the medical malpractice system would lessen the costs of defensive medicine, which would provide a stable source of funding for health insurance – and better healthcare and a better quality of life — for every American.”

You must be joking. This may be the most far-fetched argument for physician immunity out there.

CJD

]]>