Comments on: The litigious doctor http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/litigious-doctor.html medical blog Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:04:06 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/litigious-doctor.html/comment-page-1#comment-62614 Anonymous Wed, 03 May 2006 19:46:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/05/the-litigious-doctor.html#comment-62614 "Truly frivolous suits are filed 90% of the time by people acting as their own lawyer."<br/><br/>Feel free to link an article that supports that hypothesis. I am waiting. “Truly frivolous suits are filed 90% of the time by people acting as their own lawyer.”

Feel free to link an article that supports that hypothesis. I am waiting.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/litigious-doctor.html/comment-page-1#comment-62600 Anonymous Tue, 02 May 2006 19:47:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/05/the-litigious-doctor.html#comment-62600 Truly frivolous suits are filed 90% of the time by people acting as their own lawyer. Truly frivolous suits are filed 90% of the time by people acting as their own lawyer.

]]> By: Sue again http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/litigious-doctor.html/comment-page-1#comment-62594 Sue again Tue, 02 May 2006 16:13:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/05/the-litigious-doctor.html#comment-62594 Since that link requires registration, here's the relevant bit:<br/><br/><i>The judge already sentenced Dr. Rohr to six months in jail for contempt of court in response to outbursts during her trial. She will serve her contempt sentence concurrently with the six-month term Judge Shipman gave her Thursday.</i> Since that link requires registration, here’s the relevant bit:

The judge already sentenced Dr. Rohr to six months in jail for contempt of court in response to outbursts during her trial. She will serve her contempt sentence concurrently with the six-month term Judge Shipman gave her Thursday.

]]> By: Sue http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/litigious-doctor.html/comment-page-1#comment-62593 Sue Tue, 02 May 2006 16:10:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/05/the-litigious-doctor.html#comment-62593 Anony 10:13<br/><br/>Link <a HREF="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/city/denton/stories/041406dnmetrohr.2fe795c3.html" REL="nofollow">here</a> to the Dallas Morning News has her sentencing details.<br/>She was sentenced to six months for the crime, and is serving six months in a seperate sentence for contempt...apparently she made repeated outbursts during the trial which resulted in a contempt conviction. Anony 10:13

Link here to the Dallas Morning News has her sentencing details.
She was sentenced to six months for the crime, and is serving six months in a seperate sentence for contempt…apparently she made repeated outbursts during the trial which resulted in a contempt conviction.

]]> By: Sue http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/litigious-doctor.html/comment-page-1#comment-62591 Sue Tue, 02 May 2006 16:00:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/05/the-litigious-doctor.html#comment-62591 When she said it and how she said it would matter. Contempt of court can indeed land you in the pokey, not sure what her situation is. Except she's a nut. When she said it and how she said it would matter. Contempt of court can indeed land you in the pokey, not sure what her situation is. Except she’s a nut.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/05/litigious-doctor.html/comment-page-1#comment-62586 Anonymous Tue, 02 May 2006 14:13:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/05/the-litigious-doctor.html#comment-62586 I don't understand the part where it says she is serving six months in jailfor calling her trial a farce. Was six months the original sentence given at the trial in question or is she really serving that time for calling it a "farce" after the fact? If it is the latter, I wasn't aware they could do that... I don’t understand the part where it says she is serving six months in jailfor calling her trial a farce. Was six months the original sentence given at the trial in question or is she really serving that time for calling it a “farce” after the fact? If it is the latter, I wasn’t aware they could do that…

]]>