<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/04/physician-could-lose-his-license-for.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/04/physician-could-lose-his-license-for.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:59:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elena Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/04/physician-could-lose-his-license-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-66327</link>
		<dc:creator>Elena Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 07:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/04/20423.html#comment-66327</guid>
		<description>Hello,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If you visit the following URL, you will find 17 pages of abstracts from the peer-reviewed literature documenting the presence of Lyme disease despite negative serology. The collection covers all stages of the disease, not just the early stage (where there is actually consensus on both sides of the debate that serology is insensitive). &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.lymeinfo.net/medical/LDSeronegativity.pdf&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Chronic Lyme disease is a devastating illness, with neurological symptoms often predominating, despite the focus on arthritis. It has been studied for its qualities as a biowarfare agent. (see www.ctlymedisease.org)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Indeed it is this latter issue of Lyme as a disease of interest to the biowarfare establishment that has resulted in physicians being deliberately fed misinformation  by federal-backed &quot;experts&quot;. A further source of lie-mongering is the giant insurance industry, and certain other commercial interests whose profits are threatened if the reality of this disease is made known.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>If you visit the following URL, you will find 17 pages of abstracts from the peer-reviewed literature documenting the presence of Lyme disease despite negative serology. The collection covers all stages of the disease, not just the early stage (where there is actually consensus on both sides of the debate that serology is insensitive). </p>
<p><a href="http://www.lymeinfo.net/medical/LDSeronegativity.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.lymeinfo.net/medical/LDSeronegativity.pdf</a></p>
<p>Chronic Lyme disease is a devastating illness, with neurological symptoms often predominating, despite the focus on arthritis. It has been studied for its qualities as a biowarfare agent. (see <a href="http://www.ctlymedisease.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.ctlymedisease.org</a>)</p>
<p>Indeed it is this latter issue of Lyme as a disease of interest to the biowarfare establishment that has resulted in physicians being deliberately fed misinformation  by federal-backed &#8220;experts&#8221;. A further source of lie-mongering is the giant insurance industry, and certain other commercial interests whose profits are threatened if the reality of this disease is made known.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/04/physician-could-lose-his-license-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-62115</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/04/20423.html#comment-62115</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen similar treatment plans using antivirals for &quot;chronic HSV&quot;.  The symptoms treated are the usual list of vague, difficult to treat problems such as low back pain, dizziness, fatigue, etc.  Is this science or just another gimmick?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen similar treatment plans using antivirals for &#8220;chronic HSV&#8221;.  The symptoms treated are the usual list of vague, difficult to treat problems such as low back pain, dizziness, fatigue, etc.  Is this science or just another gimmick?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/04/physician-could-lose-his-license-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-62006</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/04/20423.html#comment-62006</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen a lecture by one of the proponents of these treatments and they really do give whopping doses of IV antibiotics to these patients for months with no good studies to prove it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen a lecture by one of the proponents of these treatments and they really do give whopping doses of IV antibiotics to these patients for months with no good studies to prove it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2006/04/physician-could-lose-his-license-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-61998</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2006/04/20423.html#comment-61998</guid>
		<description>Imagine treating your peptic ulcer patients with antibiotics well before they became standard treatment. There does appear to be a small, but real, probability of seronegative Lyme disease and, like much of medicine, there are proponents on both sides of the debate. See the letters (and response to)in Annals of Int. Med. concerning &quot;Guidelines for the Clinical Diagnosis of Lyme Disease&quot; at&lt;br/&gt;http://www.annals.org/content/vol129/issue5/&lt;br/&gt;If the treatment &quot;did no harm&quot; AND there was some subjective improvement of symptoms (quite possibly placebo) then the Medical Board should stay the hell outside the doctor-patient relationship. The FINAL textbook of medicine is yet to be written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine treating your peptic ulcer patients with antibiotics well before they became standard treatment. There does appear to be a small, but real, probability of seronegative Lyme disease and, like much of medicine, there are proponents on both sides of the debate. See the letters (and response to)in Annals of Int. Med. concerning &#8220;Guidelines for the Clinical Diagnosis of Lyme Disease&#8221; at<br /><a href="http://www.annals.org/content/vol129/issue5/" rel="nofollow">http://www.annals.org/content/vol129/issue5/</a><br />If the treatment &#8220;did no harm&#8221; AND there was some subjective improvement of symptoms (quite possibly placebo) then the Medical Board should stay the hell outside the doctor-patient relationship. The FINAL textbook of medicine is yet to be written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
