October 29, 2005

New Jersey keeps feeding the plaintiff lawyers. “And of course whenever this topic comes up here, someone always trots out the red-herring study showing that plaintiff-bar parasitism only increases the cost of health insurance by one or two percent. The real costs are indirect, as providers overprescribe diagnostics and procedures designed more to insulate themselves from malpractice awards than from improving outcomes for patients, and decline to provide certain services at all.”



Related posts:

  1. What if there were more pet plaintiffs?
  2. "A much greater driver of costs today are patient-demanded healthcare and CYA healthcare"
  3. Are juries getting smarter?
  4. Medical procedures: "Increasing revenue by doing very little"
  5. My USA Today column on why medical malpractice reform is needed
  6. Free doctors, save Medicare
  7. The price of unlimited access to the tort system


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 13 comments }

1 Anonymous October 29, 2005 at 10:22 am

It’s not all bad. I got rich performing untold numbers of expensive imaging tests that were motivated by fear of lawsuits. Too bad though for the patients who had no idea that they were being put through procedures that had little chance of benefitting them.

2 Anonymous October 29, 2005 at 12:06 pm

The article is right on target except for one thing – the doctors of New Jersey were assessed 75 dollars to put into this slush fund, as were attornies, who are presently suing the state to get out of the fee. The taxpayers didn’t pay a dime. Also, over 35% of the money did NOT go to doctors, but to fund hospital charity care. Great solution, huh?

3 Elliott October 29, 2005 at 12:14 pm

How silly of me to think that peer-reviewed studies are better sources of information than uninformed opinion.

4 Anonymous October 29, 2005 at 12:41 pm

Anon 11:22 sounds like CJD, but could also be Elliott just trying to be anonymous.

5 Anonymous October 29, 2005 at 3:27 pm

“How silly of me to think that peer-reviewed studies are better sources of information than uninformed opinion.”

You’re not silly; you’re absolutely despicable.

6 Anonymous October 29, 2005 at 4:16 pm

“Anon 11:22 sounds like CJD, but could also be Elliott just trying to be anonymous.”

It’s CJD. He’s disgraced himself by posting innumerable factless, pro-ambulancer-chaser fantasies so now he’s afraid to post under his old pseudonym since it has become such a laughing stock.

7 Anonymous October 29, 2005 at 5:05 pm

“I got rich performing untold numbers of expensive imaging tests that were motivated by fear of lawsuits.”
Hey CJD do you know about the Stark Law?
And did you know that doctors bill only for consultation and procedures in the hospital and interpretation of studies with hospitalized patients? The hospital gets the money(if they get paid) for all those tests you’re talking about.
Are you trying to mislead the laymen who read this blog? You don’t have credibility with the physicians here for sure.
Does the C in CJD stand for crooked or for convoluted?

8 Anonymous October 29, 2005 at 5:41 pm

CJD = Cares Just (about)Dough

9 Anonymous October 29, 2005 at 9:49 pm

This is my first post on this one, and I do still sign most of them.

I think it’s funny when an anonymouse calls out someone else for not posting their name.

I also think it’s funny how obsessed you guys are with me. Just think how much you’d know if you spent half the time you spend worrying about me into improving your skills.

CJD

10 Anonymous October 30, 2005 at 7:49 am

Oh, I see. It’s us who are obsessed with you. Shouldn’t you be out there chasing some ambulances instead of hanging around this blog making a fool of yourself 24/7?

11 Anonymous October 30, 2005 at 8:11 am

“I also think it’s funny how obsessed you guys are with me”

We’re not obsessed with you. It’s just that you happen to be the Sodomite on our “block” representing your malignant profession, that has ruined so many of our specialties, so you’re an easy target.

12 Anonymous October 30, 2005 at 8:33 am

“Too bad though for the patients who had no idea that they were being put through procedures that had little chance of benefitting them.”
Hey CJD, you or your clone also said 2 weeks ago, “If you’re telling me CT’s or ultrasound don’t help diagnose appendicitis, you’re full of crap.”
It sounds like, you don’t know what you’re talking about on any given day.

13 Anonymous October 30, 2005 at 10:05 am

I have no idea what you’re talking about there, last anonymouse. I think you may be so desperate for attention that you’re putting words in my mouth just so I’ll respond and give you the validation you so desperately crave.

Wish granted for today.

CJD

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Previous Post

Next post: Quicken Medical Expense Manager

Site Meter