“My patient lived – so she sued me.”
A frivolous lawsuit is filed after a physician suggested hospice care, but the patient lived. Although the majority of lawsuits that do go to trial are won by the physician, the mere act of being involved in a frivolous lawsuit is quite disruptive. Lawyers are paid to be in the courtroom – physicians are not. Every minute spent at depositions and hearings is a minute taken away from what doctors do best – which is patient care. Simply another way the patient loses with frivolous lawsuits:
I still have bitter feelings toward that attorney, though. I wonder if he appreciates or cares how such a nuisance suit can disrupt a doctor’s life, and cause him significant “pain and suffering.” Since this is a small town, I’m sure I’ll run into him at some point, and perhaps I’ll address the matter directly with him.For me, this case was an exceedingly stressful and time-consuming experience. I’m still upset that despite having helped Millie through her difficulties, and thereby extending her life, I was wrongly accused of negligence. Ironically, if she had passed away sooner, I probably wouldn’t have been sued.
Related posts:
- Medicare now requires physician essays for hospice care, as if pre-authorizations weren’t bad enough
- A patient sues for waiting too long
- Are patients who enter hospice care really abandoned by their primary care doctors?
- Joe Jurevicius sues the Cleveland Browns’ team doctors, would an apology have helped?
- Reasons not to become a doctor
- A mother sues because she has twins









{ 27 comments }
← Previous Comments
I don’t know who said this amidst all of this talk about lawsuits – but let me ask a question.
Who do you think makes more money? The top 100 law firms in the country, all added up — or the top 100 hospitals in the country — all added up?
Alois, maybe you should get some of your brain surgeon relatives to help find your brain. (”I could care less how much insurance company execs make. I know i wouldn’t have to pay malpractice insurance [which is slightly over a quater of a mill alrady in my family] at the price that it is now if you Lawyers would just go do some thing else.”) To blame the cost of your insurance solely on attorneys and not the hideous insurance industry — and not doctors who have been negligent — is absurd.
Maybe you can explain your position to Dylan Malone. Read on.
Statement of Dylan Malone before the House Energy and Commerce Committee Health Subcommittee Hearing on “Current Issues Related to Medical Liability Reform” February 10, 2005, 1 p.m.
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee: Good afternoon and thank you for this opportunity to speak on behalf my son Ian, who died last May, never having spoken a word. The victim of medical negligence during a botched delivery, he did not live to see his fifth birthday.
Ian is not alone. Medical errors are one of the leading causes of death and injury in our nation. As many as 98,000 Americans die every year as a result of preventable medical errors according to a National Academies of Sciences Institute of Medicine study. More people die from medical negligence and mistakes each year than from highway accidents, drunk driving, breast cancer and AIDS. According to a 1997 University of Chicago study the number of injuries caused by medical accidents in inpatient hospital settings could be as high as three million and cost as much as $200 billion.
But Ian was more than a statistic to my wife and I, he was our son. You never saw a more excited father-to-be than I was in the summer of 1999 when Christine was prescribed the drug Cytotec to induce labor, we didn’t know that the drug’s manufacturer warned against the possibility of serious brain damage if used by pregnant women, but our doctor did. In fact, the drug is used in third world countries to induce abortions because it causes violent contractions. Every bottle of Cytotec shows a pregnant woman with a no sign drawn through her. To hide this from us the doctor gave us the pills in a simple brown envelope. The Cytotec caused such unnaturally powerful contractions that Ian was literally smothered in the womb; they lost his heartbeat about 20 minutes before he was delivered. A
stillborn, his little body color was more grey than blue, and he had to be resuscitated.
Because Ian’s health care providers falsified his chart to show a steady heartbeat throughout labor, made no mention of Cytotec, and listed him as breathing with a heartbeat at delivery, the intensive care unit had no idea of the severity of his injuries. This cover-up attempt probably made Ian’s outcome even worse. The resulting severe brain damage left Ian unable to swallow, so the secretions had to be suctioned from his mouth by machine. He was fed by way of a tube into his abdomen, and suffered from seizures and aspiration pneumonias. The insurance companies didn’t want to pay for his care – they coldly suggested we put him up for adoption.
Eventually we set out to tell Ian’s story to a jury. There was a settlement and we were able to provide the hundreds of thousands of dollars of care Ian needed every year. I am committed to honoring his memory by fighting to improve the system for those who will come after him. I strongly believe that there are many things we can do to prevent many instances of negligence and medical errors. I want people to know that medical negligence is a serious problem in this nation, and that instead of fixing it, President Bush wants to pass a law that would target all victims of medical negligence no matter how severe the injury or how horrible the care. This is a very important point. The backers of this radical proposal to change medical malpractice in our country would hurt ALL victims – not just those who have so-called frivolous cases. It really offends me when I hear that word. I want the President to fix the health care mess and to stop blaming victims like my son Ian. My son’s life was not frivolous. Let’s start with medical negligence and medical errors. The President wants to cap medical malpractice awards at $250,000 – I say if we’re going to have a cap – let us cap the number of people who suffer from medical negligence every year. It’s a national scandal that as many as 100,000 people die from medical errors annually.
We didn’t know it then, but the doctor who killed Ian had lost eight suits before we ever saw him, and he is still practicing medicine today. In fact, other children have been terribly injured or have died under his care since Ian’s birth, largely because the medical board refuses to act on his license, for Ian’s injury he paid only a $1,000 fine. Of course, most doctors are highly skilled and care deeply about helping their patients. However, a small minority of doctors are causing the majority of the damage, and we have to deal with this life and death issue. We also need to make sure that insurance companies don’t gouge doctors for their medical malpractice insurance premiums. Doctors should only have to pay rates that are based on what the insurance companies have actually paid out in claims. The bottom line is that I think it should be up to juries to decide whether a lawsuit shouldn’t be in court. I trust juries, not the insurance companies and HMOs. We all should. It’s one of our most valued rights as Americans. People need to know that this debate is really about protecting our constitutional right to a trial by jury. And when they do, I don’t think the American people will stand for this assault on one of our most fundamental freedoms. Nearly 100,000 Americans die every year from preventable medical errors, that’s the number we need to cap. Thank you for allowing me to be here today.
← Previous Comments
Comments on this entry are closed.