Comments on: Favor http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2005/04/favor.html Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:32:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Anonymoushttp://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2005/04/favor.html#comment-52413 Anonymous Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:18:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2005/04/favor.html#comment-52413 See also (this weeks issue of Archives of IM)http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/165/7/784 See also (this weeks issue of Archives of IM)http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/165/7/784

]]> By: Patrick McCormickhttp://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2005/04/favor.html#comment-52386 Patrick McCormick Sun, 10 Apr 2005 04:18:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2005/04/favor.html#comment-52386 This paper itself doesn't define "recent MI". It appears this cofactor comes from a previous paper that proposed the Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index. Unfortunately, that paper is so old that ScienceDirect doesn't have full text.<br/><br/>[21] <a HREF="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(89)90564-0" REL="nofollow"><br/>C.S. Landefeld and L. Goldman, Major bleeding in outpatients treated with warfarin: incidence and prediction by factors known at the start of outpatient therapy. Am J Med 87 (1989), pp. 144–152.<br/></a><br/><br/>I dug around a little bit with google, but every resource I found just says "recent MI". This paper itself doesn’t define “recent MI”. It appears this cofactor comes from a previous paper that proposed the Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index. Unfortunately, that paper is so old that ScienceDirect doesn’t have full text.

[21]
C.S. Landefeld and L. Goldman, Major bleeding in outpatients treated with warfarin: incidence and prediction by factors known at the start of outpatient therapy. Am J Med 87 (1989), pp. 144–152.

I dug around a little bit with google, but every resource I found just says “recent MI”.

]]>