Favor

April 9, 2005

I don’t have full-text Medline access. In this study by Beyth et al. assessing the bleeding risk for patients on warfarin, a “recent” myocardial infarction is identified as a risk factor. Can someone look up the full text and find out how many months constituted a “recent” MI according to the study?

Many thanks in advance.



Related posts:

  1. Avandia and heart attacks
  2. Defensive medicine op-ed reaction
  3. Does universal health care favor the irresponsible?
  4. Does it matter how doctors give patients their diagnosis?
  5. The New England Journal of Medicine focuses on primary care
  6. Do patients want doctors to text message reminders to them?
  7. Texting young liver transplant patients to take their medications


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 2 comments }

1 Patrick McCormick April 9, 2005 at 11:18 pm

This paper itself doesn’t define “recent MI”. It appears this cofactor comes from a previous paper that proposed the Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index. Unfortunately, that paper is so old that ScienceDirect doesn’t have full text.

[21]
C.S. Landefeld and L. Goldman, Major bleeding in outpatients treated with warfarin: incidence and prediction by factors known at the start of outpatient therapy. Am J Med 87 (1989), pp. 144–152.

I dug around a little bit with google, but every resource I found just says “recent MI”.

2 Anonymous April 12, 2005 at 12:18 pm

See also (this weeks issue of Archives of IM)http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/165/7/784

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Previous Post

Next post: Next Post

Site Meter