Comments on: http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2005/03/half-assed-screening-of-malpractice.html Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:09:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Curious JDhttp://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2005/03/half-assed-screening-of-malpractice.html#comment-52301 Curious JD Mon, 28 Mar 2005 00:22:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2005/03/18055.html#comment-52301 Exactly, that's why you have the physician. <br/><br/>I would hope that the lawyer would have tried med mal cases for the plaintiff and the physician had testified as an expert for both sides in the field the case concerns. Exactly, that’s why you have the physician.

I would hope that the lawyer would have tried med mal cases for the plaintiff and the physician had testified as an expert for both sides in the field the case concerns.

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2005/03/half-assed-screening-of-malpractice.html#comment-52299 Anonymous Sun, 27 Mar 2005 02:06:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2005/03/18055.html#comment-52299 It seems that many lawyers have no idea about what constitutes true "malpractice". It seems that many lawyers have no idea about what constitutes true “malpractice”.

]]> By: Curious JDhttp://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2005/03/half-assed-screening-of-malpractice.html#comment-52293 Curious JD Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:48:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2005/03/18055.html#comment-52293 You need someone who understands the burden of proof and the evidentiary rules governing the admissibility of evidence, among other things.<br/><br/>It seems many physicians have no clue what the burden of proof is in these cases. You need someone who understands the burden of proof and the evidentiary rules governing the admissibility of evidence, among other things.

It seems many physicians have no clue what the burden of proof is in these cases.

]]>