Monday, January 31, 2005
There really shouldn't be any circumstance where chaperones aren't used during intimate examinations
Comments:
Gee, I wonder if Medicare/Caid and all the insurance companies will be required by law to increase their reimbursements to cover the salary of a full-time "chaperone" for private practices if such a law was passed.
lol Highly unlikely. Physicians will have to eat the costs, just like they always do. This country is a joke. I agree in principle with the idea, but they'll never implement it correctly, and it will just be more red tape and expenses for doctors. Very sad.
lol Highly unlikely. Physicians will have to eat the costs, just like they always do. This country is a joke. I agree in principle with the idea, but they'll never implement it correctly, and it will just be more red tape and expenses for doctors. Very sad.
Precisely point above. Doctors are not going to swallow the costs. That's what so absurd about medical self-regulation, as Dr. Kevin has advocated in the context of med mal caps.
Doctors cannot be trusted. When a gynocologist sexually uses your 16 old daughter during her first pelvic exam, who are you going to call-- his buddies at the medical disciplinary board. Ha, Ha, Ha!!!
Doctors cannot be trusted. When a gynocologist sexually uses your 16 old daughter during her first pelvic exam, who are you going to call-- his buddies at the medical disciplinary board. Ha, Ha, Ha!!!
No offense, but what exactly did your little tirade have to do with my point, or the points made in the article?
That was quite the juvenile diatribe, by the way. Yeah, you're right-- OB-GYNS rape their female patients all the time. Yup, a really well-substantiated argument, that.
Post a Comment
That was quite the juvenile diatribe, by the way. Yeah, you're right-- OB-GYNS rape their female patients all the time. Yup, a really well-substantiated argument, that.









