That baby really wants to get out

A reader forwarded this photo to me. I don’t think I’ve seen this before.

Update:

Seems like there’s a good possibility that this photo was doctored.

Comments

woodenshoe
what a stunningly beautiful picture, thank you…
YummY!
Wow. That is amazing.
My first thought was to wonder if it was manipulated somehow.
Kevin
I was wondering the same thing myself. I wonder if the size of the foot is proportionate to a fetus that size. Maybe an OB can give more insight.
Anonymous
Check snopes.com – this picture is a fake. You shouldn’t be able to see a foot from not only inside the abdomen, but inside the uterus.
Kevin
Lol – I knew there was a reason why I haven’t seen that before.
Anonymous
Yeah, I was thinking that couldn’t be real. When I was pregnant, I would occasionally see a bump, but never a fully formed foot- or handprint. There’s too much padding in there. But it’s a neat picture anyway, if a bit scary.
Beth
http://supermom3604.diaryland.com
Dot Bar
Okay, guys…now you just CAN’T seriously think this pic is real!? Kind of cute in a freaky way though…hmmm..you know if you place that foot straight down and hanging out the birth canal, you would be illustrating how I felt carrying one of my kids in my 9th month! oh, sorry. Off track for a moment there. lol.
Jersey_Lily
Speaking as a woman who carried a breach baby (portentous of his stubborn nature, though I did not know it at the time), this picture might not be real but it certainly feels real .
Anonymous
Certainly a fake. That much detail would require an impossibly thin uterus adjacent to an impossibly thin abdominal wall, one with a ventral hernia, to boot. So it is a Photoshopped fake.
Anonymous
Well, ladies and gents, if you’ve ever seen an X-ray of a newborn foot you would notice that there is very little mineralized bone present. This image shows impressions created by distal phalangeal tips that don’t exist in the fetus; the lateral ridge in this image would represent an abnormally flattened calcaneus, if a fetus had a developed calcaneus — which it doesn’t; finally, what are those two bumbps–lateral and medial at the base of the phalanges?? If someone is trying to simulate the os of the great toe on one side –puleaze…those won’t be calcified for years. The bump on the medial side? I dunno. This might be an alien.
One last addition…the asymmetric impression of the phalanges implies an amount of dorsifelexion that this foot is not capable of.
Nice try.
CodeBlueBlogMD
Anonymous
I don’t really know wut that is but I don;t think thats suppose to have full detail of the foot?I stand with might be an alian,

That baby really wants to get out

Related Stories

More in Uncategorized

Comments

Site

Channels

Subscribe

Related Stories

More in Uncategorized

Comments

Site

Channels