Reefer madness hits the Supreme Court
Chris Rangel writes about the current issue of medical marijuana that the Supreme Court is pondering.
Here is what the Mayo Clinic writes about the medical applications of marijuana.
Related posts:
- Does consensual doctor-patient sex actually harm the public?
- Physician apologies, and does saying you’re sorry mean it’s your fault?
- The Mayo Clinic opposes a public plan, and the dissonance facing progressive health reformers
- Partial birth abortion ruling
- A fat dog drug
- Should hospitals use Twitter to follow patients?
- Medical marijuana and college students
KevinMD.com on Facebook
{ 1 comment }
Of course, this is quite aside from the question of whether the government has any right to legislate the use of marijuana in the first place. Classifying it as a “most dangerous drug” is quite a whopper. Given the number of FDA-approved drugs that have taken people’s lives, a drug whose greatest medical maladies are “loss of coordination” and “impaired memory” seems quite benign.
Comments on this entry are closed.