<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can&#8217;t find the flushot? Get the pneumonia vaccine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2004/10/cant-find-flushot-get-pneumonia.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2004/10/cant-find-flushot-get-pneumonia.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:50:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2004/10/cant-find-flushot-get-pneumonia.html/comment-page-1#comment-51703</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2004/10/cant-find-the-flushot-get-the-pneumonia-vaccine.html#comment-51703</guid>
		<description>Kevin:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Randomized trials and meta-analyses have shown a benefit to pneumococcal immunization in young people with a high risk of pneumonia (e.g. SA gold miners, New Guinea highlanders, who have intact immune response, respiratory irritants, and close living quarters). The randomized trial (or meta-analysis) data supporting the immunization of the elderly is much more scant, despite the data from retrospective trials. There doesn&#039;t seem to be an effect on death or pneumonia, although there does seem to be some protection from bacteremia.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/1/1&lt;br /&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=pubmed&amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;list_uids=14583920&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I like your idea, but I think you&#039;re overemphasizing the efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination. On the other hand, it is not unreasonable to approach pneumococcal immunization like Pascal&#039;s wager, and to advise it since it *may* help, and is unlikely to cause problems.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over on the CDC website, they show efficacy figures for Symmetrel and Tamiflu that approach those of influenza immunization (70%). This may be a more effective approach for those who cannot be immunized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin:</p>
<p>Randomized trials and meta-analyses have shown a benefit to pneumococcal immunization in young people with a high risk of pneumonia (e.g. SA gold miners, New Guinea highlanders, who have intact immune response, respiratory irritants, and close living quarters). The randomized trial (or meta-analysis) data supporting the immunization of the elderly is much more scant, despite the data from retrospective trials. There doesn&#8217;t seem to be an effect on death or pneumonia, although there does seem to be some protection from bacteremia.<br /><a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/1/1" rel="nofollow">http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/1/1</a><br /><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&#038;db=pubmed&#038;dopt=Abstract&#038;list_uids=14583920" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&#038;db=pubmed&#038;dopt=Abstract&#038;list_uids=14583920</a></p>
<p>I like your idea, but I think you&#8217;re overemphasizing the efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination. On the other hand, it is not unreasonable to approach pneumococcal immunization like Pascal&#8217;s wager, and to advise it since it *may* help, and is unlikely to cause problems.</p>
<p>Over on the CDC website, they show efficacy figures for Symmetrel and Tamiflu that approach those of influenza immunization (70%). This may be a more effective approach for those who cannot be immunized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
