<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Good point</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2004/09/good-point.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2004/09/good-point.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2004/09/good-point.html#comment-51665</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2004/09/good-point.html#comment-51665</guid> <description>The people who it is working for tend to be, well, voters, have higher incomes, work in the media and include almost 100% of the folk in DC (or your state) who set public policy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Plus the healthcare systems seems to work well for anyone that is healthy.  It&#039;s when you&#039;re sick and have no insurance that the big trouble starts.  I&#039;d guess that this population is well under 10% of the total US population, and also tends to have lower income, voter participation, and media visability.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The other major problem (I&#039;m sure there are alot more) is that people in the US think there are unlimited resources in healthcare.  To pull numbers out of my a**, something like 40% of the healthcare budget is spent on less than 5% of the patients.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For some interesting reading I suggest checking out the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) over in the UK.  They are doing some interesting economic work on how to spread their limited healthcare dollar (drugs, devices and procedures).  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=appraisals.completed&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- jeet</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people who it is working for tend to be, well, voters, have higher incomes, work in the media and include almost 100% of the folk in DC (or your state) who set public policy.</p><p>Plus the healthcare systems seems to work well for anyone that is healthy.  It&#8217;s when you&#8217;re sick and have no insurance that the big trouble starts.  I&#8217;d guess that this population is well under 10% of the total US population, and also tends to have lower income, voter participation, and media visability.</p><p>The other major problem (I&#8217;m sure there are alot more) is that people in the US think there are unlimited resources in healthcare.  To pull numbers out of my a**, something like 40% of the healthcare budget is spent on less than 5% of the patients.</p><p>For some interesting reading I suggest checking out the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) over in the UK.  They are doing some interesting economic work on how to spread their limited healthcare dollar (drugs, devices and procedures).</p><p><a href="http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=appraisals.completed" rel="nofollow">http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=appraisals.completed</a></p><p>- jeet</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 341/345 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 11:53:02 -->
