Why EBM won’t fly in the United States

August 29, 2004

There is an interesting discussion going on at Blogborygmi. Nick applied the evidence-based Ottawa ankle rules in a situation, only to be overruled by his attending – “in our country, I can’t afford not to get an X-ray.” Discussion ensued in the comments, with arguments discussing whether EBM is merely a cost-containment strategy versus good medicine.

I would agree with the attending in this case. Until physicians are sued for doing too much testing, I will always err on the side of extra testing. Cover-your-ass indeed. The reality is this – they always get you for the zebra you miss. We are in a nation where physicians are practicing two forms of medicine – “correct”, evidence-based medicine and United States-style, defensive medicine.



Related posts:

  1. A doctor in Cuba becomes a nurse in the United States
  2. A major obstacle impeding universal coverage in the United States
  3. "A cure for cancer could be one of the worst mistakes for the United States economy"
  4. Countries with worse health care systems than the United States
  5. Saving what’s good about the United States’ health care system
  6. "The real danger of replicating Canada’s system in the United States"
  7. What the United States health care system can learn from Mexico


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 2 comments }

1 kittykitty! August 29, 2004 at 9:20 am

Yeah, I trained at the University of Rochester, which is big in EBM. We were always looking at the evidence and the 2 x 2 tables and deciding how cost effective this or that was. . . then I went to practice on my own in the real world. I found myself doing the mammos on 40 year old women, even though the EVIDENCE said start screening at 50, because community standards were different where I lived and my threshold for getting sued and a fullblown panic attack was pretty low. . . It’s different in the WORLD.

2 Kevin August 29, 2004 at 9:37 am

Completely agree. There are two worlds out there: the “ideal”, evidence-based world and the “real world” (sounds like a scene from “The Matrix”). More on this from a previous post: http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2004/06/ideal-medicine-vs-real-life-medicine.html

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Old dog, new tricks?

Next post: Risk factors for heart disease

Site Meter